All wrong. Do

This is really bad.. its very difficult to do that.. there has to be over whelming evidence of wrong doing..those that have this company as a manager need to get ahold of your tenants right now and get a new PM right now.. or your going to lose a bunch of money .. have move outs  damage etc.. been there done that.. time to take action is right now.And hopefully MOrris will up his game as a marketer and choose reputable people..

What I meant to suggest is that it would not make sense to sue one entity for the wrong doing of another entity. 

Disclosures do not absolve you from any wrong doing, doesn't matter what you disclose.You also can not learn in a few days, weeks or even months or even years on your own how to manage these FC deals.Maybe by putting it this way, I have more than tons of knowledge and experience, I have conducted FCs, there isn't much if anything I do not know on both sides of this issue.

Bob was not involved in any wrongdoing with NR and, if you know him, you will know that would be entirely against his nature.

will apply.Am I going about this completely wrong?Does

I would even go so far as to offer to write a letter for their files that absolves them of any wrongdoing should the exboyfriend come back and ask for his deposit. 

I called hgim to speak about it verbally and when I did he became aggressive with me on the phone and denied any wrong doing.

@Robert Kim In reference to the findings by the Sec and Exchange commission, it was not the owners of PFP that was charged for the wrong doing, if anyone is going to make a statement against someone they should take the time to read the filing in full.  

From my understanding (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) does this conversely mean that if one's services are free to homeowners and one does not charge them out of pocket for services rendered, one doesn't need a bond or application?