I suspect that the time of many landlords keeping rents THAT low around here will steadily disappear now that there is state wide rent control.

The courses / mentors rely on the success of a small percentage to show their programs work but you have to ask would they have been able to do it on their own for a fraction of what the program cost.I did not see a cost associated with the Flipstress program after doing a Google search - 95% of what came up was from the Flipstress program itself which would have me question how big it is and effective the program is on a wide scale.Before sending any money I would see if you can find anyone that has used the program and find out what it did for them. 

Most sub2 sales involve a seller who is distressed, but that doesn't necessarily make it a predatory deal.Just about everyone in the US knows that owning and renting real estate is a tried and true method to wealth, but 99% of people will never own a rental property for a wide variety of reasons, fear being one of the biggest. 

They preferred a platform that was widely known to them.

Another challenge is to get people with a wide level of experience in development.

MN is NOT landlord UN-friendly or friendly, there simply is no such thing as that generalization STATE wide.

Hey David,In my opinion I think that you should try Propstream.I say that because you receive a bigger bang for your buck.When you work with Propstream you receive access to a wide range of tools and resources. 

I have 3 clients willing to buy: they are highly focused on specific buildings (and line) they want, and are watching the market to attack potential distressed owners and grab the best deal.Hope it gives the perspective, even if it's only focused on Miami, that is one of the hottest market nation-wide and some dynamics that are very local (i.e. latin-american buyers buying cash to take $ out of their country) I think a lot of this data for miami is wrong. it's not a buyers market or even close to a buyer''s market. 

It’s been unable to sell because the original house was a single wide in the 70s that was then added on to.This makes financing either difficult or very expensive for people (especially since it’s a low price point and mainly first time buyers).We would be paying cash - so it’s not an issue for us.

Personally, I'm also seeing a wide range of quotes now from different carriers.