Exterior maintenance and yard work are usually handled by someone else.

Even if you can't get the 100% of purchase + 100% of rehab though, you could still be looking at only needing to cover 5%, 10%, or 15% of the purchase with seller financing as opposed to the more standard 20% down on a DSCR loan.

As you may know being local, SB249 is the bill that came up as a defense against towns like North Conway trying to shut down STRs, but it ended up in zombie state due to the sheer nature of diametrically opposed views on the matter and Governor Sununu’s push to do better than what the bill ended up proposing.Some details here: https://legiscan.com/NH/bill/SB249/2022As with all areas in New England I encourage investors to start thinking of oversaturated STRs markets as expense offset versus cash flow properties.

For example, if an HOA establishes a rule regarding exterior paint covers, deed restriction enforcement would be with that HOA.It is important to be aware that liability for breaking a covenant rests with the titleholder to the property, even if that individual is not the one who technically engaged in the deed restriction violations.

Normally, I'm always opposed to selling anything ever. 

We do not drink but I wasn't opposed to providing a local wine that was fun.

Exterior didn’t need much – sharp new accent color for exterior doors, and other aesthetic enhancements, plus some upgrades on roof flashing and weatherproofing.We discovered that the ground level water intrusion was because a huge crack in a sloping sidewalk next to the building was funneling all the stormwater right over the sill, into the onsite-manager’s unit.

Thanks everyone by no means am I opposed to paying 0 in closing or buyer agent fee's and this thread helped provide clarity on what to expect. 

If his opposing principal backed out of a deal because they had received a better offer or any other reason not considered “legit” by Mr Helmsley he would NEVER do business with them again.  

Unfortunately local politics often lead to policy considerations that are intended to drum up voter base appeasement as opposed to doing what's best for the municipality/city.