It can also be probably fight in court if this is a monopolistic practice if you think about it but who will want to fight it :D.  

Faced with mounting expenses, extended timelines, and diminishing returns, we ultimately decided to sell the property instead of continuing with the BRRRR strategy.The Insurance Mistake:The biggest lesson I learned was that I had the wrong type of insurance.

Hi Randall-Congratulations on buying a rental property well back in 2020.I am sorry to hear the property is now cashflow negative $200 a month.Your question is should you sell or continue to keep it with the negative cashflow.Depends on your personal goals and if being negative $200 a month plus any unexpected repairs or vacancies is affordable to you, but if you can solve the negative cashflow by turning the property into a furnished mid-term rental, for example, your future self may thank you.To Your Success!

The main reason for this is to continue to do medical missions around the world  even when I'm dead.

Places like Texas where you’re at will likely continue to face significant insurance increases given more weather related events which makes it challenging To pencil, but if you have good population growth, things should even out.

The provider I am using allows for 60 days of continued coverage once construction. 

Our handyman team of 2 are moving out of state after working with us for almost 18 years to start/continue their real estate investment journey in a more affordable state. 

I would continue with the STR in NJ.

With that, I'll continue to use them as my PM.

How do you continue  guaranteeing a rate of return or redemptions when the asset class is real estate which is not liquid?