The following details matter when asking this question and you didn't provide them: Level of participationREPS or notType of property (short-term, long-term)Since you didn't provide them, it look Austin Cheatham answered the question assuming long-term, and didn't take the other factors into consideration.

This is more common that you might think.They do not take into consideration the costs borne by the investor associated with the transaction such as: closing costs, carrying costs, finance costs, exit costs, etc.They are trying to hit a homerun on every deal and not leaving enough "meat on the bone" for the next person. 

Thanks for your consideration!

I would suggest anyone considering web developer to build a site to take this crucial factor into consideration.

On the other hand, I could hold on to the property with the thought that I can handle the expenses of keeping it, while continuing to pay off considerable equity and gaining appreciation for each year I hold on to the property.I would love to hear everyone's thoughts on what is the best option, as I have been having trouble making a decision given my limited knowledge and experience. 

However investing in DIRECT real estate investments differs considerably from investing in mutual funds, index funds, bonds, money market and REITs that most investors are familiar with.  

That isn't always relevant to a deal, but worth consideration.

Part of your consideration is the type of loan you will use.

You will want to pay special considerations to properties that investors own, as they are more likely to be willing and able cash buyers for your own home.

For instance, having a network of experienced investors can help you navigate challenges and identify profitable opportunities more quickly.Another consideration is the potential benefits of passive income.