data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f59fd/f59fde246228e79a5bf10d4b44d169b2b20641d0" alt=""
9 May 2016 | 32 replies
That's one reason I'm not a big fan of mixing personal and rental use - it gets too complicated for tax purposes, and it's too easy to lose your personal residence tax exemption.The way I see it, you have a few options:1) Sell w/ seller finance, and recognize your gains over the term pro rata w/ the proceeds from the sale.2) Move back in for 2 years, then sell as a personal residence?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e118/7e118b7488f733488532bde27ee7e910c33f0cef" alt=""
16 September 2019 | 82 replies
We have been very successful structuring our investments in the following manner:- Investor returns are equal to the cash flow of the property distributed in accordance to the pro-rata shares invested by the members.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/459cd/459cd3f8b5bb6312d45e33145f9aa99aadb185e4" alt=""
22 September 2016 | 23 replies
There is also the issue of non-secured creditors who should receive a pro-rata share of the estate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d15a5/d15a5290e557d3b3c6cc1f2b97f5a05fbd698b80" alt=""
23 May 2011 | 14 replies
I have posted this elsewhere, but it seems to fit well here too:American Pension Service's Newsletter on UBIT From David HanickI spoke with David a few years back when we were setting up a blind pool fund to see if certain transactions would trigger pro rata UBIT.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9463/b946313d71552efa7007061bcec186ec60795769" alt=""
18 April 2014 | 12 replies
DISCLAIMER: I'm not a lawyer, but I imagine this language could be used to justify billing back some pro-rata share of the water bill back to this particular tenant - even with the knowledge that the tenant has never previously been charged back for water since there is a "No Waiver" provision.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c85dd/c85ddb7d0ed24e4699ebf57d5fd52f7c8fe91a36" alt=""
22 September 2014 | 4 replies
You propose a pro rata share of the selling price of the entire property.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3bba/a3bba3346842b2e72cb27feff8d69a5029138806" alt=""
4 April 2015 | 5 replies
I suggest filing for an extension to have this corrected so that you can file properly and avoid being audited.If you file using the Partnership LLC Schedule K-1 IRS Form 1065, you and your partner should show your pro-rata income, credits and deduction here.Check with your state requirements through a CPA just to verify what I said was correct.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1f9b/a1f9bfb2d7580d46be37ce7343857563e53ee49c" alt=""
25 April 2017 | 10 replies
The more sophisticated method is to bill back the water bill on a pro-rata basis according to either the number of tenants in each unit or the size of each unit.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a14dd/a14dd0069f197c416db54391b34b2e7d273084a3" alt=""
26 August 2007 | 13 replies
Either he has already paid the taxes for the year and you have to add your pro-rata share on the closing and then you will deduct them on your taxes or he has not paid them yet and you will get a credit to reduce the purchase price by the pro-rata share he should have paid and then you will have an offset on the entire tax bill paid so your deduction will only by your pro-rata share for the year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1466a/1466a0feed1e65d4e75b350f6f3a88a3dbfa325d" alt=""
23 November 2021 | 9 replies
Even better is that the water is now being billed back to the tenants on a pro-rata basis and eliminates a huge water bill each month.After it's all said it done the property went from a 4.5% cap to a 6% cap when you factor in the amount of money that went into the rehab.