@Minh Le  on thing I was thinking about with this thread was all the comments ... were folks talked about how unwise or necessary owning a high end home or million dollar property.. and that they should live in modest accomodations and spend all their extra money on rentals..

I have noticed that most flips are not done to accommodate persons that use (no particular order) wheelchairs, low-height counters, access-ramps, handrails (hallways, bathrooms, et.al.), special sound-proofing (PTSD p...

I sure somebody can help me. My property was built in 1986 on a crawlspace. It's got a 38 gal electric hot water heater (a short one, since the crawl space isn't big enough for the normal size) that just died.  I've f...

If I have failed to respond to an email, or PM I am deeply sorry, and would appreciate the opportunity to get in contact with anyone that needs more information from me so I can accomodate their needs.

Ok so Brian you are saying that there is no way that a person could contact YOU and say Hey I'm interested in investing with Praxis because I heard good things, and FYI I'm not an accredited investor, do you have any available deals that could accomodate my situation?

The disabled must be given adequate additional "accomodations" by employers and landlords.

The TI can accomodate up to about 650 I think.

Inquire if they do have a reason why paying on the 1st is not convenient and accomodate if you can.

I am 99.9% sure there is never a need for an accomodation for a service animal.  

Alleviating depression (if depression is a symptom of the mental condition, or the condition itself) is a function of an emotional support animal and should satisfy the requirement.An animal with a history of dangerous behavior need not be accepted:[A] housing provider is not required to make a reasonable accommodation if the presence of the assistance animal would (1) result in substantial physical damage to the property of others unless the threat can be eliminated or significantly reduced by a reasonable accommodation; (2) pose an undue financial and administrative burden; or (3) fundamentally alter the nature of the provider’s operations.so they do point out that an animal with a dangerous history need not be accepted, but what good would that do as most of that 'history' would be after-the-fact (after the damage). afterall, that's what no-pet laws are in place for in the first place, to prevent physical damage, to prevent dog fights and dogs attacking and killing infants and the like. and there were already exceptions for disabled people such visually impaired, but now there are exceptions for any tenant that any physician, psychiatrist, social worker, OR other mental health professional says needs 'accomodation' for 'emotional support' in coping with disability 'symptoms'. wouldnt be suprised if medical 'pets' are the new medical 'mari-j' at this rate!