I love how everyone reacted to the click-bait headline and not the substance of the post.

We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

Tenant agrees not to place into any drain lines non-approved substances such as cooking grease, sanitary napkins, diapers, children’s toys or other similar object that may cause a stoppage.

We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

This is against the Economic Substance Doctrine which states that a transaction has economic substance if: (1) the transaction changes in a meaningful way (apart from Federal income tax effects) the taxpayer’s economic position; and (2) the taxpayer has a substantial purpose (apart from Federal income tax effects) for entering into such transaction.It is self explanatory. 

The letter can include 50 pages of disclaimers but there are plenty of CPA's that lost a lot of money and their license by providing quasi-assurance with insufficient basis for doing so even with disclaimers of liability.I know you don't care how many CPA's you harm, but you are dead wrong in criticizing a CPA for being smart enough to deny your ridiculous request. 

Asbestos containing material is not harmful until you mess with it get fibers in the air, which get in your lungs.Problem with removing is that you will cause a lot of fibers to become airborne, that's why its so expensive. 

I hope anyone who has been financially harmed by them can get some satisfaction, but as @Wayne Brooks has said, there are so many people lined up, there may not be any money left to satisfy any judgments.

We don’t know any PMCs to recommend in the area mentioned, but since selecting the wrong PMC is usually more harmful than selecting a bad tenant, you might want to read our series about “How to Screen a PMC Better than a Tenant”:https://www.biggerpockets.com/member-blogs/3094/91877-how-to-screen-a-pmc-better-than-a-tenant-part-1-services-and-processesWe recommend you get management contracts from several PMCs and compare the services they cover and, more importantly, what they each DO NOT cover.

Arguments for:Reduction in green house gasses Improves home owner’s cash flow position by lowering energy bills n average of ~$80/monthArguments against:Raises housing prices by average of $9500 in already expensive place to live (expected to raise mortgage payments by ~$40/month on average)Raises barrier to entry for home ownership, harming low income familiesInfo from the California Energy Commission Website:http://www.energy.ca.gov/releases/2018_releases/20...FAQ’s:http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/doc...Infographic:http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/doc...