The biggest red flag looks like the notarized acknowledgment that the building complies with all codes at the time of construction.

Acknowledging the countless time this question has been asked over the years, I'll just add a couple clarifying points I don't see in the near universal recommendation around Schlage Encode locks: 1.

Also, what I was told per the notary was ;There is a difference between a “sworn to clause” and a “notary acknowledgement”.

For what it's worth, my past, and current management agreements state:  "Agent shall indemnify and hold Owner harmless from any loss, costs, damages, suits and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees) arising from any negligent act of omission of the Agent"I'm not a lawyer, but that language makes me much more comfortable with the PM;  we both acknowledge our responsibilities and this clause tells me that the Agent is willing to take responsibility. 

Learned that due to the state I live in (AZ) my wife has to acknowledge and approve the lease, even though she is not on it, due to Community Property laws.Did you work with any real estate professionals (agents, lenders, etc.) that you'd recommend to others?

Therefore, even he would acknowledge it was a bad decision. 

You will also then no doubt acknowledge what it's like walking on the Malecon at night.

I sign addendums all the time acknowledging correct name.  

The Parties acknowledge and agree that the Subject Property is being sold in “as-is” condition.2.

And possibly even stamp it with a 'See attached notary acknowledgement/jurat/affidavit' (depends what it is) and then fill out a CA specific notary sheet to attach.