I don't think the typical sub-to deal would lead to equity skimming because they are likely close to foreclosure and there isn't enough time to rent the unit back out and make money allowing the unit to go to foreclosure.

If he rents it out for 5 years, he now has to pay capital gains tax on that $300K (and any subsequent appreciation). 

I just reveled at a companys lead strategy that lead from the website directly to whatsapp.

My research was leading me to Stessa.

Both strategies—flipping and long-term holds—can lead to financial freedom, but the key is to be realistic, patient, and adaptable.

They have literally help me change my life around from a direction that lead down a rabbit hole towards a life to live in peace and prosperity.

Most of us have passions that will never be followed, amazing businesses or ideas that will never be pursued… unless we can solve the Cash-Flow Freedom Equation, which ultimately leads to Time-Freedom.

It's like the blind leading the blind...for a hefty price of course. 

This also leads owners to ASSUME simpler is better when it comes to management contracts.

I've wondered that myself and thought: If an investor was looking for birddogs why would the birddog have to pay the investor money before they began securing leads for the investor, that the investor would then in turn give the birddog an investor's cut on the profit end???