If you are purchasing a 12, 20, or 100-unit property, you will need deep pockets when requesting vacant possession and, unless you have a business plan that repurposes or redevelops the property for a higher and better use (and you get it at a steal of a price}, it is unlikely to make business sense.A few years ago, we walked away from an 80+-unit, two building  deal because the vacancy rate was at 60% and the carrying costs in addition to the costs of rehabbing and modernizing the buildings put the break-even point too far into the future to make business sense.As part of our diligence when underwriting a property, we review all tenancies (leases, payment history, etc) and collect estoppels from each tenant.  

This is a classic example of why having minimum screening requirements is a good idea for a landlord because it takes some of the emotion out of this situation.

It's a shame to see a classic piece of architecture just rot.    

The problem here is not that she doesn't own the property, it's that she can't do what she wants with it... which is classic economic marketability, and not covered.So then on to the question was the title defective?

I'm a firm believer in classic white appliances. 

@Scott Mac that looks like a 1971 classic.  

These questions are a classic questions.

it was not the court it was the bankruptcy trustee... we sent them the money and I know it was 2 to 3k.. so just a classic waste of our time and effort..

Same with décor, timeless classics rather than trendy finishes.

Currently I'm doing the classic “House Hack” if you will, with one property I own.