I am having great difficulty interpreting California tax code regarding tax deed sales and need help for the following scenario:Minimum bids are initially set to total of all outstanding tax liabilities (including penalities and interest); however, in the case of no bids, the county may elect to re-offer the parcel at an even lower starting bid. 

This is an advanced and controversial topic and is subject to your CPA's understanding and interpretation of the law.

BBVA Compass Bank (Alabama Court of Civil Appeals) as interpreted in the DDNK v.

@Dave FosterMy interpretation is that she lived in the house for atleast 2 years but it is unsure based on what she mentioned.Mentions purchased in 2020(not sure what month)mentions rented for a little bit over a year(not sure when it is started to be rented out)

I had the exact same thought when I asked the question, but I knew different people would interpret it differently and the answers would be more interesting if I didn't attempt to narrow it.

I'll admit I probably don't understand airdna type products as much as I could but after spending time inputting my property and interpreting the reports I gave up.

@Jarrett FogelmanSelf-promotion is rightfully not allowed on the forum and so I don't want to write anything that potentially could be interpreted as such. 

He also suggested I find a CPA in my county as each county assessors tend to interpret prop 13/19 slightly different and I would need to cater the verbiage of the Trust to my county's assessors.I am currently unclear on what my best course of action would be to be able to purchase my dad's house from my siblings upon his passing. 

If you need help reading and interpreting, just whistle

Your interpretation is you're taking back your original capital which wouldn't be taxable.