It's certainly possible to get a 3K/month return on a 100K investment but I would have to say that is by far a rarity and would be an exceptionally good and uncommon (and possibly risky) deal - you're talking about a 36% return.I would never say never, but I think it's very unrealistic to expect that kind of return early on in your investing career.

Hi again @A Bee,It's not uncommon for commercial listings over the magic $10 million price point to only have a buyer side commission, which the listing broker does not split with a buyer's agent.

In San Francisco $200,000 is not an uncommon household income.  

The double-pane window seals are worn and the windows fog in between the glass (I understand this is not uncommon). 

Well if those people moving here can't find jobs, they will just continue to 'bunk' with relatives and friends - it is already not uncommon to see 2-3 families already living under one roof.  

What your finding is not uncommon.

Many investors work together on deals so it wouldn't be uncommon to split profit 50/50 if you source a seller and she provides a buyer. 

It is not uncommon to rent a house back to a seller for a short period to give them time to move, but why the seller or their assignees should expect to stay in your property for free for 3-7 days is beyond me. 

These can be single story SFRs, 2 or more story SFRs, multi-story residential MFRs, or even mixed use commercial (uncommon).

Hi All, I'm under contract on my first buy and hold, and there isn't any central A/C (not too uncommon here in Chicago.)