In fact it’s a sweet young lady.

in the near past I use it to sell off properties i foreclosed on and dont want to rehab.. buyers like it  I understand the rules.but talking Mrs old lady into this is as you note just another way to make a deal without taking the sellers interest in mind.. thats what sells these guys but if you have a sophisticated seller then  its fair game in my mind.

Schools, president, social economic class, race, religion, privilege, geography, education, mom, dad, school lunch lady didn’t like me, the raiders got short end of stick on tuck rule………..I think at end of the day the effort is not there to better ourselves.

And this is pretty wild but we are going into contract on a one of my new builds at www.ivyridgeestatescanby.com with a client that bought in the Very first subdivision I built in Beaverton Oregon and just sold lots to builders...

It’s not even quite in place yet but they sold it to some poor lady for some ridiculous amount of money.

I assumed family law because it's very defined yet the wild west in litigation, from my experiences.

It's a pretty wild question... hey, I got a small amount of money and I've built a few houses, how do I create a $10 million dollar business............Having said that, I agree that this would be the most likely path given the amount of info you provided about your skillset.

Unfortunately, as my search for the perfect property began the same people who had rented RV’s and stormed into the wilds of American were also now on the search for a second property.

Hey Michael - we definitely have a lot of consensus here - based on the facts in Texas, I would agree with you that it sounds like the burdens and benefits of ownership (or at least a significant amount of them) are transferred as of the auction date, and based on what you stated, I would also feel comfortable taking the same position for a TX property - it would certainly not contradict the revenue ruling given the related restrictions on the property and taking possession are an entirely different fact pattern, making the ruling moot in your scenario.Which I think highlights even more one of my closing points (and your point as well on Jurisdictions) - this likely changes wildly by jurisdiction. 

I approached the lady that owns the well and she said that was fine verbally.