We told her it was her responsibility (as outlined in the lease agreement similar to what’s been posted).

There are a lot of events through a group I am associated with that talk on these subjects.

@Bridger L Logan hey, all i do is rent by the room. i have a bunch of BP blogs on the subject too. happy to help in any way that i can. 

So I’m pretty close to you, once I pull some cash I have sitting in a flip that will probably turn into a brrr I’ll be about 70/30 stocks, I really don’t mind buying property provided I think for some subjective reason that area is undervalued/will outperform the market, but to me the stock market has a few advantages, 1. it is much easier obviously/more liquid. 2.

You mentioned you're reading books on the subject - that's always helpful.

I suggested that the agent represent themselves --- that suggestion started a lively discussion on the subject of self-representation on real estate deals.Do you self-represent on real estate deals where you are the buyer/seller?

If the appraisal deems it to be "Subject to" you will have to use a renovation loan/construction loan to repair and close. 

The difference in locations between one mile and five miles could be highly subjective and difficult to nail down.

In terms of is it a good deal that is completely subjective.

.: I'm curious how CA agents can make a living with laws like AB2992 that state:"If the out-of-pocket costs to pay their agent remain too great and the seller and buyer have not yet reached an agreement on the sales price and/or terms, the buyer may walk away from the subject property provided there is an exit clause, proceed without representation, or approach the seller's agent about possible dual agency representation."