Am I interpreting that correctly?

Can the OZ leaders in your firm point to the text in the tax bill that can be interpreted as much?  

A third of rich Chinese are leaving for US and Ca nada.Most likely a mis- interpretation in financial sources.

Can any of you help me interpret this result? 

I ultimately interpreted this as though Airbnbs were being frowned-upon by local government.

.  ;-) Interpreting point...Yes, 50k in Cincinati may not get u much cash flow , but what r our options then? 

If the Appraiser chooses to include converted living spaces as GLA, the Appraiser must include an explanation detailing the composition of the GLA reported for the comparable sales, functional utility of the subject and comparable properties, and market reaction.”I am a layman on this matter, nonetheless this is my interpretation: Unless this "4th Bedroom" has a permanent heat source, is completely finished out according to spec with the house, and comparable to neighboring properties with finished basements, then there is a good chance it will not appraise.

There is no way you can interpret your numbers with any consistent accuracy. 

This is an interpretation, and not something explicitly outlined in the tax code. 

(c) Prohibited transaction(1) General ruleFor purposes of this section, the term “prohibited transaction” means any direct or indirect—(A) sale or exchange, or leasing, of any property between a plan and a disqualified person;(B) lending of money or other extension of credit between a plan and a disqualified person;(C) furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between a plan and a disqualified person;(D) transfer to, or use by or for the benefit of, a disqualified person of the income or assets of a plan;(E) act by a disqualified person who is a fiduciary whereby he deals with the income or assets of a plan in his own interest or for his own account; or(F) receipt of any consideration for his own personal account by any disqualified person who is a fiduciary from any party dealing with the plan in connection with a transaction involving the income or assets of the plan.Purely my opinion here, but the between interpretation would seem to make sense as the proper intent of the code.