Plus, the fact that you wouldn’t have to bring money to the closing table is a win—some investors have had to do that just to move on from a bad decision.That said, if you can hold on, cover the mortgage, and keep repairs manageable, it’s likely just a matter of time before values bounce back—especially with the projected rate cuts.Both options are valid, and there’s no right or wrong decision here.

You bring your end buyer to the table (C).

WELL said, As I have posted many times " what value do you bring to the table "  this poster well.....

If you bring the missing skills to the table, you both win and you will learn what you feel you are lacking now.Use the calculators on BP to get you focused on deals and see what works and what does not work. 

I haven't had someone misunderstand me because I always say "100% financing of the loan and rehab costs, requiring you to bring much less to the closing table" and then proceed to explain lender fees, insurance, and title fees that are due at closing. :) 

Prices on everything I own have gone up 2-3x and my cash flow went from ~$150/door to $500-$600.I still believe Detroit offers that opportunity today and is why I continue to pound the table on it.

. - we could bring less then $50,000 cash to the table. 

Would all traditional loan options be on the table?

They ultimately walked away because this fund requires "a seat at the table" with key decision authority on when the asset can be sold or refi'd.  

Would this not reduce the number of potential buyers brought to the table when the realtor can't use the largest marketing platform to its full advantage (aka the MLS)?