I think what he needs to realize is when you build a community and a bad apple infects the rest, it's all going to come down. 

I am not a park expert I have owned 3 of them.. and I have one now that was a tweaker village.... the amount of work for an owner to allow NON owners into a park and the risk of the park getting infected with riff raff is just too great... now as you state if your HUNGRY for any kind of rent you may over look that but if your a park owner and one that has pride in your asset .. then you want to keep it all owner occ..

Since it is not an apartment complex, I am less concern about infecting other tenants with a lax mentality. 

We would only consider disclosing whether the building has a reported/confirmed infection but not the actual case.

So IMHO, the following asset classes should be considered but with the assumption that a deal sponsor has 1) taken such asset class through a recession or two and 2) on a market by market basis: MHP, MFH, storage, medical offices with concentration on infection deceases, and assisted living.

Leather gloves and proper work boots will also save you much grief and potential infections. 

Fifth is waiting on a recovery from a bronchitis infection, sixth is looking into amount owed on loan.I need:Simple PSA agreementFeasibility clause'Cost est for setting up LLCAssignment agreementsI know I'm asking for a lot here so if anybody has a great attorney please send me their info or send them my infoJon Hong 206-372-9010Thanks and hope you're enjoying the sunshine we're havin'

.- Based on the longest running study, if there are no other risk factors involved, the rate at which an infected man will transmit the HIV virus to a woman is one in 1,100 sex acts.- Based on other studies, if there are no other risk factors involved, the rate at which an infected woman will transmit the HIV virus to a man is about one in 8,000 sex acts.- HIV can mostly be prevented by condom use.

LOLI do not get too much into politics and the big picture too much.Dennis I understand your position.My mom a few years ago had a full knee replacement.The surgeon that operated on her is one of the best in my half of the United States.Medicare covered part of it and then her secondary insurance picked up the rest.She was one of the last patients with Medicare that this Doctor took.The reason he no longer was taking Medicare is not only were they going to start squeezing them on pay outs but the bigger issue was control of the patient care.For instance my mom has one of the best knees with no issues and full range.It's the same the professional athletes get for sports etc.The surgeon was telling us Medicare was fixing to dictate to them what brand and quality of knees they would have to surgically install in their patients.All because they want to buy cheap crap to make a buck and buy in bulk.The surgeon said he is not putting in junk knees from Medicare and then the patient sues him for revisions,infections,messed up internal parts that fail prematurely when the problem isn't the surgeon but being forced to use an inferior product.More policy thinking they know what is best but creating more problems than solving them.

We have all been sick, and have had several doctor appointments over the past year relating to coughing/headaches/sinus infections/etc.