If I had a CPA prepare my tax return and it is audited, I would expect the CPA to defend his work on my behalf without charge.  

Besides if something happens you need it to be something a lawyer can defend in court.

@Hassiem Cliett Great to see that you have a champion mindset, if you are 100% serious and the numbers work, get your parents to co sign for you and sign a contract with them that says the day you turn 18 you get 100% ownership and responsibility.

One of the main ones is Champion real Estate. 

The advertisements in question in this investigation include such language as "no children" or "no Section 8," in blatant violation of the law.The settlements, filed today in Suffolk Superior Court, collectively require the property owners and real estate agents to pay the Commonwealth $18,250, ($8,750 of which is suspended pending compliance with the agreements), attend trainings on state and federal fair housing laws, remove lead paint hazards from the rental units, and prohibit the defendants from placing discriminatory advertisements or otherwise discriminating against any person who seeks or applies for housing because they are a member of a protected class.

In that process, all interested parties are notified, where they can either defend or they lose their rights by law. 

Right now I'm sending the summons out to defendants -- no hearing date set yet. 

I do at some point tell them to their face, if they get violent then I have a right to defend myself.

Nothing herein shall be construed to preclude use of an electronic signature as defined in § 59.1-480, or an electronic notarization as defined in § 47.1-2, in any written notice under this chapter or legal process under Title 8.01.I suppose I take some liberty in my interpretation, but it's because I've seen a judge dismiss a U.D. case when the defendant said they did not receive an email notifying them of the landlord's choice to non-renew.If you provide "notice" in one of the methods that code recognizes then I can't imagine a judge dismissing a case because the defendant says they didn't receive it. 

(not defending the practice, but I can see why an agent would want to chose one option on a deal vs. the other)