The real issue is whether you can prove that you had the intent to hold the property for rental, investment or use in your business.The easiest way to demonstrate your intent to hold a property for investment or use in your business is to do just that.

The same people that will appreciate a clever-funny name will also appreciate a clever name in general and most of the people that would be turned off by clever-funny will actually still appreciate a clever reference that demonstrates a higher level education or thoughtfulness.Just my two cents

It uses numbers to demonstrate why buying cash flow is typically not a good decision.  

To do this, a housing provider must show that its policy accurately distinguishes between criminal conduct that indicates a demonstrable risk to resident safety and/or property and criminal conduct that does not.A policy or practice that fails to take into account the nature and severity of an individual’s conviction is unlikely to satisfy this standard.

It really depends on the situation, you can't take them to court if you're just not happy, they have to have done something demonstrably wrong for example they charged you for a new paint job and then didn't do it.

This is what he said regarding fair housing.If an applicant or tenant wants to have a service animal or emotional support animal, the tenant must—unless it is clearly obvious—demonstrate, through documentation, that the applicant/tenant or a member of his family [1] has a disability, and [2] has a disability-related need for the service animal or emotional support animal that helps the applicant/tenant or family member enjoy his/her housing.

Is it illegal to not rent to Prostitutes especially if the tenant screening service shows demonstrable income on a consistent basis?

This is why there is no holding period but rather the standard of intent and how you can demonstrate that intent if ever asked.Because @Charlie Moore, is describing a transaction where he purchased a property primarily for resale it does not qualify for a 1031 exchange.   

While the small rant above was just to demonstrate that not every market is the same, still, when we look at the national market, we are seeing a consistent growth in prices and very low inventory.Why could this be? 

You may be able to hold the PM responsible if you can demonstrate negligence, but that would be a hard case to prove.3.