hi - wondering if there is an Equivalent to the 1031 exchange in Canada - or more spec in ONT?

You will find the equivalent of the RPA-CA's Paragraph 25 B in those CAR Purchase Agreements. 3) Regarding OPENING ESCROW, BUYER'S INITIAL DEPOSIT, INSPECTIONS and CONTINGENCY PERIODS, "Short Sale" transactions should use the following procedures:a) Until Lender approval of the "Short Sale" is secured:(i) Escrow should not be opened.

Real estate exchanges are preserved in the initial proposal, but may face more scrutiny or modification as the bill moves through the House markup and continues through the Senate.In the legislative Section-by-Section Summary, Republican drafters of the bill argue that the proposed use of full expensing on tangible personal property would be equivalent to the benefits of Section 1031:"The bill provides full expensing for most tangible personal property which provides amarginal effective tax rate of zero percent to fully expensed property, equating to thedeferral that like-kind exchanges provide currently."

FYI I know of a 1031 DST provider who refunds to investors (upfront) the usual 7%+ upfront fees (which can be a substantial savings and make it equivalent to a non-DST structure).

Interesting insight into MTR demand given there is not an AirDNA equivalent for MTRs yet.Regarding MTRs, I think that's it's important to not put all your eggs in one basket (like travel nurses) as demand can always shift. 

However, nowadays, most rates are north of 5% and I'd rather have that 5% in cash or cash equivalences to use. 

Every $1,000/mo increase in NOI is equivalent to $300k gain in equity on a 4 cap (our market).

In my market at least, I found that the rent received was surprisingly almost equivalent for furnished and non-furnished.

Hey Annie - you're asking the right question here.With the assumption you can comfortably afford both houses without the rental income AND they are in equivalent neighborhoods, the house hack will be better from a pure financial perspective for the following reasons:1.

The odds of you being sued for such a large amount that your insurance won't cover it is probably equivalent to being struck by lightning twice.