Just so there’s no question of his interpretation and yours. :)

I've seen several comments regarding the substantial improvement requirement of opportunity zone real estate, but they don't seem to match with how the law is written, at least as I am interpreting it.

Is that a correct interpretation?

I interpret the neighborhood rent is actually $900-1050 not the other way around.

One would also argue the term is too vague to be properly interpreted in a legal sense.

This is how I interpreted it. 

According to how I interpret these bylaws is they need 67% approval of the homeowners and 51% of the banks to expand to the community and to deny future use of a common element.  

(See, for example, RCW 61.34.120, which is full of convoluted language that may be subject to various interpretation.) 

@Russell Brazil That’s interesting law there, if I interpreted that correctly.How about an example where, after inspection, the buyers communicates:“We have found additional blah blah blah, if the seller is willing to reduce the price by $5k we will continue with the contract.  

All parties right now sort of have me running in circles with no answers and interpreting on my own, hah.