The broad context of this analysis is straightforward: an economy based on ever-rising consumption falters when real household incomes stagnate or decline.

See your attorney.If you take the option and have had an insured loss, then loss proceeds can be assigned, see your attorney.As a tenant you can't restrict ownership rights, a first right of refusal can block sales, an indemnification agreement may take care of liens, so see an attorney.Gotta say, it's certainly not the worst I've seen, but this isn't for public consumption.

Many before they hit the MLS.He knows I am a cash buyer and am always looking for a great deal.Over the last 11 years, he has made me a lot of money.Find yourself a sugar daddy realtor.

I have been wholesaling since Dec 2013 in the Houston/Sugar Land, TX.

So they sugar coat things and make it look like what they're teaching is the easiest thing to do.

One of the things we could do is to change our tax code and go more to a consumption tax.

Don't sugar coat the risk to yourself, your seller or your end buyer.

Think about things like cigarettes and alcohol, no matter which way the economy is headed those things will always be in consumption.

Sugar is a good one: http://www.sugarcrm.com/crm/products/crm-products.htmlAlthough, from the sound of your request, it could very well be overkill for your needs.

You are clearly seeing the sugar coated side of this deal. 6 college kids in a unit!!!!