Yes I am in total favor of paying for their factories to pollute the environment less so that they can continue to take jobs away from our economy.

The current administration has waged a war against coal (because of pollution concerns I believe) that is killing our number one cash cow.

There is also the problem of this potentially polluting my credit during the 6-month redemption period.

We have a polluted lake front doted with old steel mills.

But I will be incorporating the water into some of the landscaping and from a moral standpoint don't want to allow unnecessary pollution on my property. 

It's common knowledge around here not to eat any fish that you catch downstream from the refinery and its pollutants. 

Total pollution exclusion - many policies have this exclusion and it can become an issue if there are injures due to Carbon Monoxide.Premises liability coverage is important even though liability claims are more rare than property damage.

Of course traffic, pollution and high cost of living are all challenges that are not going away.Taxes are a problem that is driving out some businesses, but really it is a burden on the wealthy people of the state more than it is corporations.

And sometimes pollutant loads in a house increase just because the air filter needs to be changed and someone left it in place for months. 

People will get deterred from buying a house there, which in turn lowers the market value of that area.3) Visual pollution.