Getting 100% of rental income, appreciation, loan pay down, and depreciation for 20% down makes 10% annual roi easy to destroy.  2.

@Destry Dylan Thomas Sholder I’ve discovered it’s just better to let tenants leave than risk them destroying the unit or not paying for months or getting involved in a lengthy eviction.

Section8 helps getting the most rent, If you the tenant does not destroy the property.

But if you give them nicer units, they're less likely to destroy them.

.#4 Not charging big enough deposits for nicer homes, I have had many recently renovated properties that tenants have destroyed.

It takes decades of doing the right thing to build, and seconds to destroy. 

Inevitably you have to clean a little different if they have a pet so that costs money but if they haven't destroyed something then $300 is a little steep.

Maybe that is not even good idea, but perhaps better chances of success and maintaining a relationships.Probably NOT what you want to hear, but if you're making $125,000 and you don't have the discipline or willpower or willingness to save for the down payment and closing costs on property #2, then what will you do if things go south..like your tenant doesn't pay rent, you have 3 months of vacancy, or the tenant destroys the property and you need to rehab?   

The industry is literally DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY! 

there's nothing unethical about helping people save their credit when facing foreclosure, keeping in mind that their credit will be totally destroyed by this, so at least they can save their credit by investors helping them.