
25 March 2016 | 12 replies
This would put personal belongings at risk as well as turning my own living quarters into an undesirable place to be.

26 December 2016 | 52 replies
Not daily because of the money but because it would pack on some serious pounds!

17 May 2019 | 215 replies
Don't be penny wise and pound foolish.

20 December 2017 | 18 replies
If the items have little or no value (i.e. a 1994 17" television that weighs 70 pounds or a large chest of drawers from the 70's that's missing two handles and a drawer) then you can dispose of them as you see fit.

13 January 2020 | 10 replies
If you purchase a property for only $30K in any Chicago south suburb, it will be a property that will either require a ton of work, which means that $30K isn't enough; or a property that is located in an undesirable location which means it will be more difficult to attract tenants.

3 April 2018 | 16 replies
Instead of going by breed, you could restrict by size and age, say nothing under a year of age, or over 30 pounds.

30 June 2021 | 125 replies
I have gotten close a few times to buying vacation properties as recently as May 2018 where I was in the offering stages of a property in Myrtle Beach, SC but backed out because they restricted dogs over 30 pounds and mine is a very large great pyrenese.But I'm a huge financial/spreadsheet nerd and think we need one for vacation STRs so if you don't get any help with this send me a pm and I'll build one for you.
18 July 2019 | 6 replies
Also, my son, 4 years old and 45 pounds, rides a 4 wheeled vehicle which uses skate board wheels called a skitter.

6 September 2017 | 178 replies
You'll definitelty be on the watchlist of undesirables who know where you live and want what you got....Atleast for a ride.

22 February 2015 | 46 replies
@ryan r Depending upon the size and configuration of the house, the shear loading at the corner of a residential structure can reach a couple thousand pounds of force with a design wind loading in most of the U.S.