I read a couple design books to fact check the objects and colors and feel like it's pretty solid.

What you get when you let a tenant paint is roller-marks of the wall color on the ceiling, drips and runs, patchy covering, spilled paint, silly accent walls/ too many colors, uneven lines on edges and in corners, splatters, blistering, bubbling, peeling, the wrong sheen, visible brush marks and roller strokes, trim painted the same color as the walls, electrical outlets and switches and even light fixtures, vents, cold air returns, fart fans etc. all painted when they shouldn’t be, not enough coats where paint actually should be, and terrible color choices (almost always too dark or too weird).

also since most of the advice in BP is coming from sell side, the return we got is the normal return hence why I am no longer interested.I am interested to gain abnormal return.my exerience- making 80k-100k per flip from 500k home is possible, only in CA- Out of state could be a good appreciation vehicle too- the wealth builder is created when we invest in expensive state only (CA/HI) with at least two properties- invest locally is thousand time better than investing outside because of the potential it creates- househacking and ADU is finance freedom LOLBut i develop a strong very atypical thesis also:- there' nothing passive about real estate investment- investing in syndication is more active than direct ownership- the risk of the unknown of unknown is the biggest issue in any real estate- at the end of the day, the probability of we as landlord is hitting problem with tenant/city is like 100% so be prepared- the difference between different type of real estate investment is the unknown factor and that's always the least discussed- strategy is always different depending on macro climate, if mney is cheap leveraging equity is the best, if money is expensive then buying debt is good option- don't chase best return but chase the most understood risk and capital preservation as a goal- not all RE investment has equal return/risk , syndication in multifamily for example is outsourcing all risk to investor while gp makes the most money lol- direct investment is always always better than indirect investment, except in certain asset class and extremely good sponsor that could find a noticeable return/risk reward.- donot follow the crowd, when everybody else is buying then it's good time to sell, vice versa LOL- if the math doesn't pencil, GTFO lol

Has anybody had a situation like this before or able to provide more color on best approach / details?

No wonder that, as mentioned in the attached article, pretty much everything is described with rose-colored glasses and there is a lack of anything negative.As far as I know, they haven't promoted a development in the Dominican Republic, in spite of the fact that it can be a great place to retire and invest. 

Would love more capital to keep expansion the other two sites too. The

I throw in pops of color with other accessories.  

They should be leveraged TOO.  The

Go over the mortgage numbers with a fine tooth comb.

If you want a better output you can always add more details.Potential Improvements:You could specify the types of properties (residential, commercial, etc.) or the size and diversity of your portfolio to receive more tailored advice.You could provide information about your company's specific objectives or values for a more aligned recommendation.If you have preferences for how you'd like the scoring or rating system to be (numerical, grade-based, color-coded, etc.), that could be included.If you have had previous experiences with property managers that you found particularly beneficial or problematic, including those could provide context and help tailor the advice more specifically to your needs.If there are particular areas you are concerned about (legal issues, maintenance, tenant relations, etc.), emphasizing these could provide more detailed and relevant advice.