Starting with books like "The Business of Belief" by Tom Asacker and "Money: Master the Game" by Tony Robbins, the snowball effect quickly took over, turning into well over 100 books/audiobooks and thousands of podcasts.

I disagree with #1, I think as an owner our interests are better served by sticking with lease terms that minimize turn over; turn over is valuable to property managers, but costly for owners (I serve in both roles).

@Megan Roe  I'm a new investor myself from Lutherville. 

Guess I could aim to a desired ROE so if I'm above it I'll profit and if not I won't be entitled for compensation.

I was going to say it depends on your ROE, but since it is currently negative, I would sell and 1031 that money into actual cash flowing assets.

There are some investors who are hedging their bets and buying these properties now believing the rent laws will be over turned.

There is still a chance things could get over turned, given you must go through three separate panels before you get final approval, none of which are connected, so the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. 

So your purchase might get overturned if successfully challenged.

Example, if you are "all in" to this property for $30,000 of your own cash, then $250/month (10% annual) is a good ROE (return on equity). 

I'll be curious if the appeal will have any better success at overturning the  ruling, well assuming there is an appeal.