Granite, I know CA tends to see a lot of this; more than likely due to a lot of people owning Solar.My question is the owner that has a lien status associated to this Lien description (Notice of an Independent Solar Energy Producer Contract), is this a standard practice of just owning Solar (thus wasting time prospecting these individuals) or does this simply mean they (the solar company) took out a lien against the owner because the solar company is trying to collect their money.

And if the deal itself isn’t solid, no contractor can turn it into a win. 

EDIT: Can't delete this post, so simply editing it.

While I have not done a deal with them, their agreement requires a close timing that simply will not work with conventional lenders (usually 7 days or so).  

They simply sleep on issues.

look for land with owner financing And I am sure you know this but location and safety will be paramount in the Jackson market there are simply areas the crime is far to high for this to be successful..

This has been true about every technological change in the industry - those who fail or refuse to adapt lose while those who embrace new tech win.

It seems like a win-win, especially with the simplified approval process and flexibility for multi-generational housing.

Yes, there are times they do win and make money, but not on a frequent bases in my experience.  

If the damage is minor, again I think the tenant can simply claim the quality of the appliance was poor and they have the door-seal quality issue to further back up this claim.