If you sue, and have to "prove" that the neighbor was negligent, then that would likely need to consist of multiple “written” communications from you, the city, or an arborist to your neighbor stating that you/they feel the tree in question is diseased, appears to be dead/dying, is overgrown and posing a potential threat to your property, etc.

Im new here and recently  saw a threat about housing for insurance companies .

Over the next months, the owner missed two different scheduled appointments to come back out and look at the property, and we continued to get invoices along with threats which we knew were meaningless. 

Another threat is hackers, which pose a threat to the overall stability.

But as word got out about this a local reporter reached out to Top Golf who responded they didn't want to build there, so that empty threat really backfired on them....

I will invite the syndicator to confirm or deny the threat publicly.

Pregerson ruled on November 13, 2020 that the apartment owners had failed to show “irreparable harm” because (a) there was no immediate threat of foreclosure, and (b) the City Moratorium appeared to be “imminently reasonable” in the context of the unprecedented pandemic.[3]"https://www.natlawreview.com/a...Pretty sad that the judiciary is passing the buck to the legislature and not wanting to get involved. 

may see it as a threat so concealed carry may be better.

-Tyler Seriously, you know the owner made death threats to another member on here, and not like it's a rumor legit left a voice mail lol. 

Because in their terms and conditions there is a veiled threat that if you say anything derogatory about the company they will sue you.