You seem to see more triple net on big national tenants, WalMart, Target, Chevron, or Burger King.

If 2x, 3x, 10x the # of burger trucks flood onto a given street to offer burgers to the people, to meet demand 1:1 it has an economic effect of competion driving prices to REMOVE any bloat, any false margins, right.

Hi Calvin,We pay for all property management technology fee's, etc... and that isn't a separate bill per se.Those are our standard operational expenses so on us to pay for.It would be like McDonalds charging a per burger fee for tech they use hahaWith that said, many folks don't realize how much it costs to be a full time "property manager" and not par time property manager like many realtors are forced to become due to client demand.When you are a brokerage and only focused on property management and not sales, it becomes a very expensive exercise making your company efficient and being able to offer an above par service to tenants and landlords. 

Hey all, Yes you should always use the 3x rule when evaluating if a tenant can afford your rent. However I've come across a few very good applicants who have great credit, little debt, and solid jobs.  There salary's ...

Basically a nothing-burger because the federal government doesn't have authority to implement nation wide rent control.

I know I annoy them sometimes but it is kind of like your doctor pushing you to stop downing burgers and fries because it is affecting your physical health. 

We need more energy for data centers (already an issue) and we need much more capable batteries for robots.If a robot is flipping burgers you can just keep it stationary and plugged in, but if you want a robot to move around on a construction site and build a home you need freedom from the cord and a lot of power to lift heavy objects.

Thats the pay for flipping burgers . 

I can get a great burger and chip's in Thailand for $1.40 U.S..

Now if there burger flipping doing nothing to improve themselves, well duh.