I think the truth that your post brings is in the level of sophistication and market insights of the investors and investment sponsors that are prevalent on these forums, the amount of money we are talking about, and the general idea that real estate, even when directly owned, is passive in nature.

Some people hold it just because they won't make as much as they want, but then the market goes down and they lose more so you to know the sale and rental market as well as the trending nature of the area.

Quote from @Cheryl Abram: Quote from @Duke Giordano: The nature of the limited partner and syndicator relationship is at best "holding information back" and at worst "deceptive or untruthful". 

Some are literally a pad next to someone's house, but the higher rated campsites are those with some natural enjoyment and privacy.  

That's the nature of disruptive technology I suppose.And I don't think the actual amount of the transaction is really relevant so I wouldn't say you are outclassed.

The beauty of Roth investing is the income tax-free nature of the returns. 

Most likely the state where the property is located is where lawsuits would be brought if they are something for personal injury like a trip and fall or something of that nature because the “cause of action” arose in that state.

However, if your losses exceeded your total income, they should have been reviewed for Net Operating Loss (NOL) treatment.

There's potentially a domino effect in the event of an unforeseen major expense exceeding my reserves (mainly thinking in terms of natural disasters) affecting my whole portfolio.  

This type of company will be married with you through the longevity of the investment so naturally their interests will have to be mutually aligned.