Or even more laughably, it's the white people in the majority that are routinely and harmfully discriminated against?

I will also tell them the truth if I am the owner of the property, since that is actually public record.They really did not do anything to harm you or your financial interest.

I think that price point there is not too much harm, but still have that plan of refinancing into a shorter mortgage down the road.But to me, it does feel like a not so bad strategy to get into your first property!

Of course one might say …oh well he is an independent contractor, you should sign a contract that says blah blah …great ..then I will tell you once you and your attorney will be fighting the case in court and you will be wasting your money and time deliberating contract law and proving that he had his own brush hence he acted as an independent contract and his attorney will be accusing you of negligence as the work place was unsafe ….I will be looking for a next crib to flip while Javier will be collecting $600 a month state money watching Telemundo

so that's a moral dilemma.. not telling the truth up front in your advertising.2. subject to your partners approval when you have no partner.3. leading sellers on to think they have a solid deal when in fact the ONLY way it will close is if you can resell it.. this causes a lot of harm to those in distress IE foreclosure I have bought many a home that a wholesaler could not get their act together and I stepped in and bought it behind them.and then you have license laws..

Drugs or any harmful activity on the property will be grounds for eviction.Listen this is your property, but what I am hearing is that you are afraid to go to your own property.

and with a little backing from google, you do know when you are being negligent:There are four important elements to a negligence lawsuit that must be proven: The defendant owed a duty, either to the plaintiff or to the general public The defendant violated that duty The defendant's violation of the duty resulted in harm to the plaintiff The plaintiff's injury was foreseeable by a reasonable person.I realize you are a lawyer and see a different side, and I respect what you are saying, and respect what you've done.

It's a gift to the government for having not thought through your structure properly.Now if you had been a regular LLC, you never would have paid that $1953 in tax because all competent software recognizes that you already met your Social Security limit and all is well.Now, if you've got relatively lower salary and lower S-corp salary that does not go over the Social Security limit when combined, then it's no harm, no foul and you absolutely do save a lot of taxes in structuring as an S-Corp.Guys - taxation is NEVER cut and dried.  

I find that if you ask questions about tenure, punctuality, workplace disputes and other things of that nature, you are able to get a better feel of the tenant.

@Taylor KamalMold is potentially harmful to your health.