When I conduct analysis on markets across the US there's usually a consistent theme: the affordable places within striking distance to the urban core outperform. 

From that, we get our "Strike Price", which is our term for the highest amount we'll pay for the property.

The STR property manager that sole investment portfolio relies on those STR's can lose it all overnight with the strike of a city ordinance.

That will a negative strike against your property whether you are renting or selling. 

It strikes me as pretty solid and is how I've seen it done correctly in the past.

Most seem thoroughly convinced that the bank is going to come to their rescue and strike a deal.I understand the denial that’s going on, but how likely is it that a bank will still do a loan mod if a judgement is filed?

strike it out

Strike through the lease begin date and both initial.

Medium-term rentals strike the perfect balance: they’re just right.One story comes to mind that illustrates this point beautifully.

I generally follow the 2 strike rule with people.