I hope you see the pattern.

This pattern has been going on for quite a while.I know what we can get for the property now is not a small amount.

The fact pattern you provided is actually one of the best ways to scale your portfolio, but many spend all of their time focused on managing their SF portfolios and fail to take advantage of the opportunity to transition or scale into better performing assets once the appreciation event has occurred. 

Unsure if this is the correct category.Greetings Bigger Pockets,I'm working on an IoT application that aggregates traffic data, performs image labeling, and analyzes vehicle type, travel patterns, etc.

I won't comment on your specific fact pattern, but related party 1031s are possible (I've done one).

I've noticed they all follow a general pattern.  

Until that point, you should probably be in a holding pattern or at least until you talk to your lawyer.

You can also see why we as tax professionals are really compelled to use general language like "it depends" etc to fact patterns and questions, especially on these public forums where often times there are assumptions that have to be made and maybe only partial information is provided.

The basic pattern that my search code performs is as follows:  1st search starts with "A" if there are more than 50 results for just street names beginning with the letter "A" (or containing the letter "A" in some cases), another search is performed for "AA", if there are less than 50 results, the links, and then the linked page data is collected, the next search performed is for "AB".   

In other words, the built in gain on the property distributed to you should be preserved in that property for possible future recognition.If your advisor is familiar with partnership tax law as it is applied to partnerships that hold real estate I'm sure he can handle your fact pattern.