The lady who got sued said she believes a co-worker stole her identity and rented the place. 

Recently I was shopping for insurance for two identical properties in the same quality neighborhoods in MO and KS.

https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/49/topics/329...That's just one of many threads that have almost identical wording in the title. 

@J Scott I am in an almost identical situation to you.

It provides some privacy as beneficiaries are not listed on any public record- the trustee would need to be subpoenaed to reveal the identity of the beneficiaries.  

Here's the text:If the records of a series are maintained in a manner so that the assets of the series can be reasonably identified by specific listing, category, type, quantity, or computational or allocational formula or procedure, including a percentage or share of any assets, or by any other method in which the identity of the assets can be objectively determined, the records are considered to satisfy the requirements...

They felt that by our "verifying" their identity, it would give them more legitimacy and would help them stand out amongst those people here (and elsewhere online) who use fake names/identities.

The reason they are so low is because received Court docs, and police report, and identity theft.

Two identical building side by side managed by the same company can have NOI's of say $100,000 for one and $200,000 for the other because of the timing of their leasing.  

They may just want all of your information to steal your identity.