I've worked with groups like Sands Investment Group, Hudson Edge LLC, and others, where I primarily analyzed industrial properties with long-term leases and high recent growth potential, alongside stable A-class multifamily properties with value-add opportunities.While many of the groups I've worked with are hesitant to relinquish control of their investments, my goal is to create a balanced yet diversified portfolio, focusing on high-growth industrial assets and value-add multifamily properties.

The answer is that if the lender that's doing the hard money loan is only funding the purchase and not the rehab, they then have less oversight of the project since they're not doing the draws, and thus not seeing the progress of the project and having control of the funds or draws from the rehab to make sure the project is progressing.

Your strategy takes advantage of your employment cash flow and ability to control discretionary spending.  

How much “control” are you willing to give up? 

You lose all of the control and these are long term investments - but in my experience the returns match what I had on the active real estate and I am hiring professionals to manage the assets.  

Again, this is a factual action that will ensure that you remain in control of your property and that the other tenant has the peaceful use of the property that is a legal right.Fun, huh? 

Quote from @Danielle Levy: Agreed with everyone on this thread, this does not warrant a lawsuit due to those things that could have been controlled by you as the homeowner.

I'd like to speak to the it's the owner not the dog, it's a bit like the gun control issue.

The way I countered this (still not as good as buying a note with idle cash but I have checkbook control) is the money paid out from a note fund I invested in is at Axos bank.

He told me he owned a few mobile home parks in town (they were large and had high lot fees) and this is what sparked my curiosity.