They do hundreds of transactions a month and can guide you better than most attorneys when it comes to title issues.They use a complicated form that creates extra work and confusion with no benefit to the buyer or the seller. 

Improvement exchanges are really complicated, and in my view unnecessarily risky for this type of asset.

I am not sure I will go through with it due to it bing a bit complicated and you never know with a buyer not being able to seal the deal a year or two later.

This seems a bit risky and too complicated, in my opinion.

It just gets messy, and complicated and opens you up to false allegations of Fair Housing issues.

Unless all utilities are included it gets complicated to divide these equitably.  3.

They seem complicated, lock up your money and have a lot of restrictions. 

It's not going to force anything, but you can let them know "hey I'm sorry you're having a rough time, I'm willing to work with you on this but I need you to work with me as well".Check with your attorney for the deposit, in FL the deposit has to be made out to all occupants on the lease, so that could cause complications.

YUP  the first remains in first.. the wrap is junior to the first.. its does add a level of complication though if the first position lender needs to do a Deed In Lu ..

In fact it may actually complicate litigation in the event a claim were to arise while adding additional insurance expenses to your real estate operation.To explain why this is the case I’m going to ask one very simple question: In the event a tenant dispute, premises liability, or any other claim were to arise, what prevents the Plaintiff’s attorney from merely listing your wife who it seems is the property deed holder in your fact pattern as a Defendant?