A few have tested the waters with proposed "shared marketing expenses agreements," which I shut down pretty quickly because, lawful or not, that still presents moral hazard.You get paid when my loans fund.

While a few of us have been successful with 1 provider, it seems the moral of the story is don't put all your eggs in 1 basket.

Hey @Josh Morales!

I'm Frank Morales from Homestead, Florida, and I'm new to this Forum and for that matter new to Real Estate.

I didn't realize it would be illegal (or morally questionable) to do this, which is precisely why I raised the question here before acting.

Would let him know that any ethical-moral obligation I felt to let him retrieve his stuff from his mother's place went out the window when he opened up a meth lab in there and that he may retrieve his effects, under supervision, after he has reimbursed you for lost rent and the cost of rehabilitating the unit.

I have to tell the sellers that the house will never appraise for what they are trying to sell the house at.The moral of the story is that [/b]if you don't pay to get into a house then you may have to pay to get out of it if the market goes down[b].

You will have some disagreement on the morality of this situation.

Then I found out I couldn't sign a contract anyway, but I had some kind of moral dellema also.

In other words, they're not part of the lease.If you are PROVIDING appliances, then letting a tenant go without a working refrigerator is inexcusable and I think that you do owe them (legally and morally) something for their trouble and your breech of the lease.