Lisa,No offense, but the entire BP forum system has been around for a while, and the members for the most part have been fulfilling exactly what you state you will do.

Hey Tony , I'm not one to judge but maybe your signs are ugly and offensive - beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

I will be watching and yelling at the offense!

RESIDENT understands that any proactive steps OWNER has taken are neither a guarantee nor a warranty that there will be no criminal acts or that RESIDENT should be free from the violent tendencies of the third persons.

While ActiveRain appears to have, let's say more sophisticated real estate professionals (don't take offense)dealing in larger projects than usually discussed here, much can be gained simply by reading.

The government is in control of the largest ponzi scheme in history and yet they had the gaul to call Madoff a criminal and lock him up for doing the same thing they are doing.Government = biggest hypocrites of all time.

These are civil (not criminal) cases, so I believe that once the deadline for appeals passes the decision then is final.Now, if there are damages to be sought by somebody long after the cases have been through the courts - in that case the lenders (and the GSEs too) might be forced to pay.

Each person signing this Affidavit understands that any misrepresentation made by him or her in the Affidavit may subject him or her to civil and criminal liability.In light of this language, my client has decided to comply completely so that they don't face any kind of liabilities.

If they are government signs than yes they are the property of the government and tampering with them can be an arrestable offense.

It might require eviction of the problem-causing tenant to reach that solution ...That's about all the manager could do, unless this is an offense that's been repeated.