I obviously will do my due dillegence in having one as a contingency in my offer if I make one but is it safe to say that if a home qualifies for the "mortgage" portion of the homepath program as a general rule that all major functions are in tact?

One thing that I liked about that program, as opposed to others I have listened to, is that they emphasized the possibilities of setting up wholesale terms, vs just wholesale prices.

Since S8 is administered by the local municipality, and good and bad housing authorities do exist, your experience may vary, but I found they tend to want to boot bad tenants, cause they have a long list of applicants, and bad tenants give the program a bad reputation.As with any tenant, your screening process is the most important thing.

You can use the openoffice excel type program as well (it's FREE) if you don't want to splurge quite yet.

I am current on all payments even though my home is valued at $100K, I owe $200K, and my neighborhood is becoming inundated with thugs, Section-8's, and gang members.Is this P-PIP program a scam or is anyone getting any deals done?

If Trump even had the 200K to start, that was definitely enuff to jump start an investment program!! As

Jon,i must respectfully disagree. firstly,i am speaking of sending him to a good program. a bad one may be worse than none. if you want to keep this employee, then you will do the leg-work and find the best one you can.problems like....a. something going on in his lifeb. clarifying his desire to do the jobc.feeling under appreciatedd. bringing him back to his full production capabilitywould all be solved by a GOOD motivational sessions.it bothers me when people try to micro-analyze a problem. he clearly has an issue in his life that needs to be fixed. don't waste your time looking for it, let him do the searching and that is what motivational sessions will do for him.

:cool: A view at the numbers…Democrat Health “Reform†By the NumbersJuly 20, 2009—UPDATEDHere is a compiled a list of important numbers relevant to the House Democrats’ 1,018-page “America’s Affordable Health Choices Act:â€114 million—Number of individuals who could lose their current coverage under the bill, according to non-partisan actuaries at the Lewin Group4.7 million—Number of jobs that could be lost as a result of taxes on businesses that cannot afford to provide health insurance coverage, according to a model developed by Council of Economic Advisors Chair Christina Romer$818 billion—Total new taxes on individuals who cannot afford health coverage, and employers who cannot afford to provide coverage that meet federal bureaucrats’ standards$1.28 trillion—New federal spending in the next ten years, according to a Congressional Budget Office score of selected elements of the bill.6%—Percentage of all that new spending occurring in the bill’s first three years—representing a debt and tax “time bomb†in the program’s later years that will explode for future generations$88,200—Definition of “low-income†family of four for purposes of health insurance subsidies33—Entitlement programs the bill creates, expands, or extends—an increase from an earlier draft53—Additional offices, bureaus, commissions, programs, and bureaucracies the bill creates over and above the entitlement expansions—also an increase from the discussion draft1,683—Uses of the word “shall,†representing new duties for bureaucrats and mandates on individuals, businesses, and States—and an increase of 306 mandates from the discussion draft$10 billion—Minimum loss sustained by taxpayers every year due to Medicare fraud; the government-run health plan does not reform the ineffective anti-fraud statutes and procedures that have kept Medicare on the Government Accountability Office’s list of high-risk programs for two decadesZero—Prohibitions on government programs like Medicare and Medicaid from using cost-effectiveness research to impose delays to or denials for access to life-saving treatments2017—Year Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund will be exhausted—a date unchanged by the bill, which re-directs savings from Medicare to fund new entitlements for younger Americans$2,500—Promised savings for each American family from health reform, according to then-Senator Obama’s campaign pledge—savings which the Congressional Budget Office has confirmed will not materialize, as the bill will not slow the growth of health care costs

Many countries in Europe have instituted a similar program a while back.

I was almost done and finalized to go for hamp guide program as they had so much for people like me but then thought of getting some suggestions.