Even if you manage to find an office with an existing tenant, their lease could be approaching expiration, and without plans to renew, it can take an incredibly long time to secure a new tenant for the space.

It seems like a reasonable approach, but as you say, we'll have to wait to see what the final version of the law (if it indeed becomes a law) looks like, then figure out if a European corporation with third country investors is a reasonable solution. 

Conceptually you want to take an approach that minimizes your need to be on site - and for that reason I would advise against BRRRR.

Let's clarify this real quick,I understand this model wouldn’t work for every property owner, especially those who are looking to sell outright and walk away from the property entirely, and the approach isn’t designed to replace a traditional property sale. 

@Matt Powers there are endless possibilities and combinations of how you could approach this opportunity.

The reason I approached them about putting their offerings on my show is because I wanted to diversify my product offerings beyond the low income stuff that I specialize in so I could present investors with options that come with varying levels of risk.I do not agree with you that investors won't make money in the low income space at all tho.

Additionally, it feels the most appropriate approach for both profiles I described above and allows me to focus on learning one strategy.

Honestly your approach may be a bit rough around the edges, but actually getting out there and trying to find deals through grit and hard work is the best way to start.

Can try to reposition to Class B, but neighborhood may impede these efforts.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, but 15-20% should be used to also cover tenant nonpayment, eviction costs & damages.Tenant Pool: majority will have FICO scores of 560-620 (approaching 22% probability of default), many blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 2 years.

A friend of mine in Austin once negotiated a partial buy back option when the seller realized they might want back in if the market soared.. from what I read in Bloomberg, that approach can work well if both sides trust each other.If the tenants’ rent covers your carrying costs, that’s a nice cushion, but you still need to clarify that buy back clause.