data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fe2c/5fe2c556b6f048b464eedb1e3898b02ebc9e112a" alt=""
31 January 2016 | 23 replies
The rules of Monopoly are such that a mortgaged property CAN NOT cash flow.I'm a little bit biased, to be fair, but I'm going to have to go ahead and disagree with that...Furthermore, a political agenda is revealed by the notion that you can just pay a little money to get out of jail.The premise that your real estate success depends on a role of the dice is additional condemnation of the game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e8f7/9e8f7f9b48fb19e919c6f417f187f3857b850f3f" alt=""
27 September 2018 | 61 replies
Secondly, the idea that a court will care if you use QuickBooks is silly and reveals your lack of experience in evictions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6f4b/d6f4bf127154dc8980f267af50cb1b67f025c201" alt=""
6 February 2010 | 11 replies
Remember doc's have to be sign before the property is even revealed to anyone.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c05da/c05da399655f672fd4d19621007455d0aef368d6" alt=""
2 June 2016 | 51 replies
The page source view would reveal all words any color.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c864d/c864d0518e034e0bf70c7c995d3b2742b1783faa" alt=""
1 August 2009 | 10 replies
You aren't required by law to reveal anything unless they subpoena it out of you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8bc0/e8bc0527b77c3855d83bfde7f222d41c25762d06" alt=""
14 February 2020 | 77 replies
When I read that in the other thread, I thought it sounded so absurd there was no way it could be true...but sure enough a quick google search revealed it was in fact true.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee5a4/ee5a4d9a75eaaac23df11950b06b1545a6cf7e25" alt=""
5 December 2017 | 9 replies
Just sit down and put on paper what the results of all options are and the best scenario will be revealed to you in doing that?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cba9c/cba9c46e889a507d8a8037901d6dcbb7a61e80a9" alt=""
11 June 2015 | 4 replies
You probably have an inspection contingency, which means you have a period during which you can get out of the contract if the inspection reveals significant problems.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2497/d249786f225083a28214cab34fd7854ee6f5e02b" alt=""
25 September 2018 | 16 replies
Tennant A is a member of a protected class and Tennant B is a white guy in his 30s; their stats are as follows:Tennant A; 700 credit score, monthly income of $4,000, no felonies or any other marks on the record, and two positive landlord references.Tennant B; 650 credit score, monthly income of $3,500, no felonies or any other marks on the record, and two positive landlord references.Subjective observations of each of the tennants are:Tennant A; showed up 20 minutes late to our scheduled showing of the property, the vehicle is a pit and obviously not cared for properly, dressed in pajamas, and a review of his social media revealed multiple crude and explicit posts.Tennant B; Showed up 10 minutes before he was scheduled to view the house, clean car, dressed professionally, and had minimal social media posts all of which were clean and polite.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20e55/20e5585889dd3cafde5725d5cb32c6cc05bb56ca" alt=""
6 January 2015 | 50 replies
This means if the buyer could have gotten an inspection that would have revealed issues and they chose not to then they do not have a basis now for a claim.