One question that can be pretty revealing is to ask why they are selling?

But if you're changing the configuration at all and if removing your old cabinets will reveal flooring and wall repair.....forgit about it.

Public records and basic internet searches reveal tons of information.

Please keep us posted as the rest of the details and angles reveal themselves. 

So the down low on 3 companies I interviewed:Company AOver 400 units2 Property managersLate on the 5th- $50 charge to tenant, 10th- additional $25 charge to tenantNo project management fee1 drive by inspection per month, 1 full inspection every 6 monthsRequires renter’s insurance (single family homes only)Stated high percentage of tenant renewals Manager of the RE branch was a local town justice for many yearsHandles insurance claims2 evictions last year (both in same building- new project) - not tenants they placedSaid they serve fake eviction papers before moving on to full eviction process (to save owners money) Charges ½ 1st mo rent and 10%Red flags-Does not approve prospective tenants with owners (to keep owner from contacting them)Will not show lease (confidentiality)I did view one of the houses they manage, the tenant mentioned they had asked for a leak to be fixed and it had been over 2 weeksDue diligence revealed PM was arrested 3 yrs ago for petite larceny from a grocery store- weird a retired town justice would hire herCompany BManages 40 properties2 Property managersNew company (1 yr old)- all property managers came from another with years of experienceLate on the 5th- $50 charge to tenant, then 3 day pay/quit notice ~5 days later10% project management fee w/ weekly updatesInvestors make up 5-10% of their propertiesIn house maintenance staffOwner can approve tenantsOwner can provide own leaseReiterated how important communication was2 prior evictions1 manager has 2 investment propertiesCharges ½ 1st mo rent and 10%Does not want to rent low end housingRed flags-One of the property managers never responded to first 2 emails, 2nd manager was prompt every responseDoes not want large portfolio of rentals (150+)One of the property managers has boyfriend writing reviews on how great she is, same manager that never responded (looked him up and he has a lengthy arrest record)Does not perform regular inspections unless owner requires (sounds reassuring- sarcasm intended)Admitted no set schedule for inspections but noted “they can do them”Company CMy current agent/his wife would manage- part of a franchised-brokered companyI’ve bought and sold 1 property through him- sold in 6 days in a market with over 365 days of inventory, though the sale drug out 6 months due to the buyer/buyers agentEthics is of utmost importance to him (proven this)Late on the 4th- $25 charge to tenantWill provide project management (taking pictures, lock box for contractors) free of chargeAverage ~ 2 year tenancyWill be providing investor referencesStandard lease- owner can’t changeProvides copy of lease to ownerPrefers owner not to contact tenant but not against policy (want to send out semi-annual survey for their review of management/property)No repairs w/o owner permission (unless emergency)Drive by inspections often2 evictions last year- not tenants they placedAs an agent they are the most geared toward investors in the areaCharges ½ 1st mo rent and 10%Red flags-Current late fee is only $25 (brokered company rules)- they have a meeting next week to discussHave tenant submit background check through online platform- I’ve found tenants to be lazy and would rather you do thisNo annual/semi-annual inspections- said they check smoke detector batteries/change furnace filter once per yr

The photos and votes are now only revealed by clicking on the poster's name.

In my opinion, take the high road, stay out of the mud and creating stories and simply reveal the truth of the fraudulent transaction that started it all.

If you don't know the area well, this can reveal a lot and help you decide whether or not to continue your research.  

A recent poll, as seen on Bank Innovation, revealed that the banking customers 35-year old and younger are inclined to use non-bank services like Square or PayPal over traditional banking services.

This will reveal if your number considerations are valid.