You will have to dig to see where the property is at in the process.When I worked for developers we would keep things tightly under wraps so people didn't have much time to mount opposition to the plan.The zoning attorney also tries to picks times where most of the public won't show up.Even if you can't get the level of stories or use changed you could argue the developers finishes need to be higher grade and style.That alone might push them to another location because of cost.Once the project is altered to a certain point where the developer can't build density or has to make too many improvements to the roads,traffic lights,high end finishes to the build etc. the project becomes dead.Apartments right now are hot.Many plans call for more town homes but it is not profitable for many developers to build that in this environment.

Your argument should be that replacement of shingles that have altered color under the sun (when those shingles complied when installed) is not reasonable.

The Landlord must give 28 day notice in advance to terminate or alter the lease agreement.

I agree with what most have said that his books have been life altering for a lot of people, many on BP have attested to that and I am one of them.

Thats gonna really alter my plan going forward, but its for the better.

The types of improvements that borrowers may make using Section 203(k) financing include: structural alterations and reconstruction.modernization and improvements to the home's function.elimination of health and safety hazards.changes that improve appearance and eliminate obsolescence.reconditioning or replacing plumbing; installing a well and/or septic system.adding or replacing roofing, gutters, and downspouts.adding or replacing floors and/or floor treatments.major landscape work and site improvements.enhancing accessibility for a disabled person.making energy conservation improvements.

If training can alter that, the daily calorie intake is probably very easily altered.

I've only had the experience in altering owner occupied properties for persons with handicaps but I see this as a woman who broke the lease and brought in a person who very well may be suffering from a handicap without allowing you any opportunity to see if your property is legally able to accomodate a person with a handicap.

If I were living in it, my choice would be to not, because I would remove and alter ($$) a portion when I could.

(she's my "all business" alter ego!)