I don't see merit in the cases, but I am not an attorney nor do I know state statute outside of NC.

But because 1031 is a federal statute it is available in all states yet the QI can perform it anywhere from anywhere. 

Hard money loans are business purpose loans and not subject to certain disclosures/statutes/regulations that consumer financing is.

Read the Statutes posted númerous times as well as the title of the forum, and the first two posts and the statutes I told you to read.

Because 1031 is a federal statute and is practiced the same nationwide.  

. § 2481w.First, it is a direct violation of the Consumer Protection Act for a non-bank lender to solicit or make a loan without being licensed and in compliance with all lending requirements (including interest rate caps) contained in Title 8 of the Vermont Statutes Annotated. 9 V.S.A. § 2481w(b).Next, it is a violation of the Consumer Protection Act for a payment processor to do any financial processing on behalf of unauthorized lenders. 9 V.S.A. § 2481w(c).Lastly, it is a violation of the Consumer Protection Act for “any person” to provide “substantial assistance” to an unauthorized lender, once that person is aware (or should be aware) that the lender is not in compliance with Vermont law.

I also don't see anything in the statute itself that requires you to have multiple accounts.

So, perhaps in this case, the seller also did not alert the PMC about the sale.You are making claims about what NY laws require of a PMC & seller - please share those statutes with us...

We have reasearched other lawsuits agaisnt Reddick that involve RICO statutes, but find none in the class action catagory.

In 1970 California instituted its’ state exemption law that assets owned in a private retirement trust are fully exempt under statute.