In my opinion, take the high road, stay out of the mud and creating stories and simply reveal the truth of the fraudulent transaction that started it all.

If you don't know the area well, this can reveal a lot and help you decide whether or not to continue your research.  

A recent poll, as seen on Bank Innovation, revealed that the banking customers 35-year old and younger are inclined to use non-bank services like Square or PayPal over traditional banking services.

This will reveal if your number considerations are valid.

Why not: reveal sources, transactions, detailed daily description on how you did it, what happened, and what made it happen?

The average person thinks, "wow 36% is even high", but that just reveals more lack of financial education.

I cannot  provide too many details w/o revealing the client, but we handle cases where there may only be 30-40,000 in benefits.P.S. 

If you (or anyone) wants a longer description, just email me and I will send it (free).If you meet with a financial adviser, expect to pay a fee and plan to reveal LOTS of personal information about yourself, your family, your finances and your goals.

Seems to me that although a subpoena would reveal the true owner, at least for the purpose of law suits and the like if someone was suing me, they wouldn't be able to find my properties via public records search.

It's amazing what people will tell and reveal if you just let them.