Yes, quotas were put in place to incentivize banks to fulfill their moral obligation not to redline geographic areas, but CRA loans were never a license to lend without restraint, nor did they.

This will f*** up your moral compass for the rest of your life.Show some backbone and pay back what you owe.

Moral of the story, you were never "approved" for this loan.Investment property loans have minimal 15% down for a 1 unit and 25% down for multi-unit.  

If you plan to do this with occupied properties as a business model you may want to check your moral compass!

Those a strong moral compass, high integrity and willingness to strive for a win / win outcome are the ones who usually stay in the game. 

Borrower was working from moral high ground and wouldn't negotiate. 

Do any of you with high opinion of moral authority want to get into the business of telling who can be in a relationship with whom?  

The moral of the story is that there is plenty of money to be made in all areas of real estate investing but the buyer beware!!

Morally, I would only intend to tie up the property if I thought I had a legitimate chance of finding someone to close on it.

While I agree with Norm's points, for me, being a LL is less a moral responsibility and more one of mitigating risk.