You’ve become so clouded by growth it’s ridiculous,” Greene said.He said there is not enough information about the impact on the community that the new homes and casino could have.

I'm biased of course, but I think my area (Aberdeen, WA - Hometown to Nirvana and continual cloud cover) is one of the best I've seen for multi-family and single family homes in cash flow anyways.

Wifey liked Cloud Supreme ($3,000) or Cloud Luxe (4,000, choke!).

With the NEAT scanner, do you need to subscribe to their cloud service for storage?

That post showed the total expenses for those units to be 49.98% of MARKET RENT.If you took every single rental in the United States, factored in Market Rent and then figured expenses, including vacancy, the number would be very close to 50%.It is not some guru talk, it is not some invented number pulled from a cloud, it is FACT derived from decades of study of millions of rentals.If you bought 100 rentals, all less than 10 years old, you might keep expenses under 50% and if you bought 100 rentals, all over 100 years old, your expenses would probably exceed 50%.

It also can be difficult to get the money out if you find yourself in a bind and need it to pay bills.I contributed the maximum amount allowed to retirement accounts when I was working ("pay yourself first"), but would cut back on my contributions if I saw clouds on the horizon.

I'm active duty Air Force and went with a brokerage where I wouldn't be charged many fees AND one that was more "part-time" friendly as a cloud-based brokerage.

During the 90s there's almost no tech school, the recent tech school industry is only able to catchup starting from 2010 but now tech industry is flourishing with tech-specific career, from cybersecurity to AWS cloud.

I'm not one of the bottom chasers - I'd leave my property empty completely than rent below what I feel is fair and reasonable, regardless of the "market" (I use this house too, so that is part of it), but a lot of my PM's owners feel opposite - they'd rather have $50 than no dollars.

Rather than doing a hold back and accepting a title that's clouded with a lien which could be a problem if you want to sell or use the property to obtain a mortgage down the road from a not so accepting a buyer/lender, didn't the grandmother/seller pay off the bondsman and become the surety herself leaving the property free and clear?