I personally think it's here to stay.However, wait till big money players find a way to profit from a sharp drop.

I think it's about preventing abuse so you don't lose thousands. 

There may be an abundance of STR-preventing ordinances (or a lack of legit STR managers) in an area that would make following your recommendation difficult.

I mean, it's always done differently, but it's the same script just different players.  

Two big players in Cedar Rapids are Grace Gudenkauf and Amelia McGee.

This "analysis paralysis" can prevent them from acting on opportunities out of fear of making the wrong decision.I’ve experienced this journey myself.

It'll give you so much clout.When you are seen as a player and someone who closes on deals, that's when the calls come.

Have you noticed on BP thread after thread about assorted syndications suspending distributions, going belly up, taking measures to prevent going belly up? 

The word "estoppel" basically means "prevented from saying something different afterwards." 

Things to consider: daily internal operations, external branding and operations, lending, in addition to inside out *legal protection and outside in** legal protection, privacy/anonymity/identity protection and security...Prevention measures at different levels, preventing the attack from being initiated vs preventing the attack (lawsuit) being successful vs reducing the damage of a successful attack.... there are many elements and I see people pick one and argue about it without looking at the whole